You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘climate change’ tag.

(Insert Superman Theme Song Here) It's SUPERGORE!!!

Al Gore is for sure something else, although, my term of choice would not be near the same as his own. First he was a statesman, then came the politician. Next thing we know he is supposedly the “father of the internet”. Shortly there after he is a world renown scientist and prophet. Now he is a poet. I guess, in his eyes, he is the closest thing the liberals can get to a renaissance man. Check out his “fine” poetry here.

Advertisements

With the Copenhagen convention just six weeks away and the signing of a historically catastrophic treaty looming in the future, the White House is taking no breaks in working on climate bills that compliment the goals of the Climate Change Treaty. The Senate and Obama administration are wanting to modernize the electrical grids, shift away from oil and coal, and work towards cutting America’s greenhouse gas emissions by 20% over 2005 levels by 2020 and encourage the development of renewable energy sources like wind and solar power. Which will of course lead to a horrible economic hardship for America in itself. All in the name of a cause that doesn’t exist. And in the foot steps of a treaty that is focused on bringing about a new world government.

There has been talk of President Obama not attending the Copenhagen convention this December because he has his Nobel peace prize to accept. However, it is in the same vicinity and with the administration working so hard on bills that parallel the treaty itself  I find it hard to believe that the President won’t be making a visit after his grand acceptance speech. After all, as a Nobel peace prize recipient, he has a duty to be part of the big Climate Change convention that will change the world forever.

Sources:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2009/oct/27/obama-administration-environment-climate-change

http://www.prisonplanet.com/prominent-russian-scientist-we-should-fear-a-deep-temperature-drop-not-catastrophic-global-warming.html

https://unconstrainedtruth.wordpress.com/2009/10/21/climate-change-treaty-to-be-signed-to-compromise-us-sovereignty/ (My overview of the Copenhagen convention and Climate Change treaty)

And here is an eye opening article about the “criteria for success” in Copenhagen according to Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon who stated, “We need to step back from narrow national interest and engage in frank and constructive discussion in a spirit of global common cause.”

http://www.un.org/apps/news/story.asp?NewsID=32721&Cr=climate+change&Cr1=

I posted the video of Lord Christopher Monckton’s warning of the coming Climate Change treaty yesterday. At that time I did not feel that I had enough information to write on the issue. Although I can not find a copy of the actual treaty to be signed, I have gathered information on it from enough sources to know that what I do have is indeed true.

This December the United Nations will be holding a Climate Change Convention in Copenhagen. It is to address the ridiculous, and recently proved incorrect, notion that mankind is destroying the planet with CO2 emissions. The main idea was to punish the countries and industries that have contributed the largest amount of “damage” by having them pay other countries who have not contributed so much, or what the they are saying is payment for a climate debt. This alone is a huge and unprecedented tax on everyone that will inevitably bring about the final collapse of the American economy. But that is not all.

According to Lord Christopher Monckton today on a Glenn Beck interview, this treaty will allow the set up of a world government. The word “government” actually appears on paragraph 36 and 38. Lord Monckton states:

“There will be a new vast interlocking bureaucratic entity created at huge expense to you and me and that bureaucratic entity will have three purposes, the first of which is twice stated to be government. The second purpose is stated to be the transfer or redistribution of wealth from countries like ours to third world countries in reparation for what is described in the treaty as climate debt.”

“Now, the third element in the task of this new government will be what is called enforcement. In other words, the power of the new government to make Democratic countries hand over their cash, whether they like it or not.”

And President Obama is completely ready to sign this treaty. He has been on board with it from the beginning. We have heard Obama say that his administration is determined to combat climate change, and right after taking office he made it a national priority. As with most liberals and progressives, the environmental movement is at the top of the to do list. The reason is not to save the whales, or the polar ice caps; it is all about the ever so sought after power over others. And in an effort to appease world leaders and reserve his place in the world government, I fear President Obama will not hesitate when at this Climate Change Convention.

I know you are thinking what I did, this is never going to happen. In order for a treaty to be passed it must be ratified by 2/3 majority in the Senate. Of course, we hopefully do not have this many politicians in the Senate willing to give up U.S. Sovereignty (giving that everyone would actually take the time to read it). So there is no danger of this passing even if Obama does commit this act of treason and sign the treaty, right? I’m not entirely sure. From what I have found, and please correct me if I am wrong, if the Senate does not ratify the treaty then Obama can get it enacted into domestic law by a simple majority in both houses. That can, however, be repealed. But the Obama administration can get the states and the cities to get on board with the Climate Change treaty saying that it is what they want and take it to Supreme Court. Then the court will look for the direction in which the country and the world is moving, and then they can give the okay.

This is a communistic vision, one in which is not hard to pick out. We were even warned of this in 2007 by Czech President Vaclav Klaus who said, “It becomes evident that while discussing climate we are not witnessing a clash of views about the environment, but a clash of views about human freedom.” And communism, according to Wikipedia, is socioeconomic structure and political ideology that promotes the establishment of an egalitarian, classless, stateless society based on common ownership and control of the means of production and property in general.

Environmentalism is basically communism in disguise. It is a more subtle and an easier way to get people to peacefully (or so they think) way to hand over their rights. As the article Environmentalism vs. Communism: Is There a Difference?, it says:

“Since the years of the Cold War began winding down, a new threat has faced our nation and has now spread throughout the world. It’s seemingly innocent attempt to save the planet from human destruction is nothing more than an attempt to stifle capitalist economies and provide governments of industrialized nations an unprecedented amount of control over their populations. It is a movement that would make even Stalin proud.”

This is what we are seeing in this Climate Change treaty, except on a global scale. The United Nations as a whole is trying to take over the world’s economy and freedoms. This will no doubt take a heavy toll on the United States of America, who is being blamed for a large amount of the false damage to the environment. We will face mass taxes without representation, and have the majority of the U.S. economy shut down. It is a step towards having the freedom and rights that we take for granted right now stripped away from us without giving time to blink.

*Quoted sources are highlighted and linked within the article.

Here is the link to the interview of Lord Monckton on the Laura Ingraham show on 10/21/09.

Here is a great eye opening explanation of communism. The comparisons of the communist take over of Russia and the current events in the USA are absolutely chilling.

UPDATE: https://unconstrainedtruth.wordpress.com/2009/10/30/washington-works-on-more-climate-bills-that-seem-to-compliment-copenhagen-treaty/

I do not have all the facts as of yet, but the information given in this video from what I have found seems to be accurate. It was also addressed on the Rush Limbaugh show today as well. I will of course write an article when I have more information. In the mean time, here it is, a video which as stated in the information, “On October 14th 2009, Lord Christopher Monckton, a noted climate change expert, gave a presentation at Bethel College in St. Paul, MN in which he issued a dire warning regarding the United Nations Climate Change Treaty which is scheduled to be signed in Copenhagen in December 2009.”

UPDATE:

If you are up for some new reading material, here is the “Framework Convention on Climate Change” documentation in pdf. It may provide some insight into what is instore for this upcoming “convention”.

When I originally posted this I was not sure as to the full extent of the truth, but everything I have found so far points to it as true.

I just thought that this article was something that everyone should read. What ever happened to Global Warming? I’m sorry, I forgot, they have changed it to Global Climate Change.  Truth of the matter is for the past decade the Earth has actually been in a cooling stage. According to Phil Brennan on NewsMax.com, “The planet is not warming. Hasn’t warmed since around 1998. Instead, it’s cooling, and scientists say that it’s going to continue to cool for at least the next 20 or 30 years.” As stated in his article, “It’s getting cooler and has been since around the year 2000.” I don’t know about you, but that sure sounds like to me that we might be heading for a new mini-ice age.  Do yourself a favor and read the article on Idaho seed potato crops being threatened by, no not warm weather, but instead extreme cold temperatures. It makes one think twice about why the liberals and progressives are still pushing the Cap and Slave and other “environmentally necessary” programs despite the abundant evidence against warming. Money? I think that is probably the only remaining reason. It will only lay a huge financial burden on the countries trying to implement it. Is this a wise decision during the economic state of the United States of America? Unfortunately, time will tell.  May God help us all.

Reference:

http://www.missoulian.com/news/state-and-regional/article_c1c13d5e-b6a4-11de-a09c-001cc4c002e0.html

http://www.newsmax.com/brennan/obama_global_warming/2009/09/23/263810.html

Another Article On Why Climate Is NOT Effected By Man:

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/55278

Today, September 23, 2009, President Obama addressed the United Nations General Assembly for the first time in his presidency. In what sounded like more of a sales pitch than a speech, Obama almost immediately starts with summing up what he has “accomplished” during his first 9 months in office. Recapping everything from closing Guantanamo Bay to the billions of dollars flushed down the toilet investing in “clean energy”. He seemed anxious to make himself look good for the very little he has done. And, of course, there was heavy focus on climate change and what we should supposedly do about this non existing problem that will inevitably bring about the world’s economic collapse all on it’s own. But, I will not go into the whole “climate” issues discussed (the very last link at the bottom of this post goes into climate change) because I am personally growing tired of the same old rhetoric and lies in regards to the false notion that man can somehow destroy what God himself has made.

One of the President’s other main focuses was on what seems to me promises and hopes of a false peace. One of the ways is by  a treaty to have every nation end having nuclear weapons. He told the U.N. General Assembly, “I have outlined a comprehensive agenda to seek the goal of a world without nuclear weapons.” Obama thinks that through this treaty that the world will somehow negotiate a “world without nuclear weapons.” If that isn’t the biggest load of manure I have ever heard! Yes, I can see every nation trusting the others to lay down all their weapons. I really doubt that will truly happen. Obama even suggested that countries such as Iran and North Korea “must face consequences,” but he did not specify what that would be. He did say that America would be holding up their end of the bargain, so we can look forward to Obama further weakening our military and our means of protecting our nation.

The other false peace, that which we know will never happen, Israel and Palestine living peacefully with a 2 state solution. First of all, it is not our land to give Palestine. We have no right to try to force the Israelis out of their land. But, Mr. Obama seems to think that he does. He said “the time has come to re-launch negotiations without preconditions that address the permanent status issues: security for Israelis and Palestinians, borders, refugees, and Jerusalem.” I do not know what the solution is for the Palestinians, but I do know that we can not force Israel to give up their own land. This will never bring peace.

Now, the part of President Obama’s speech that caught my attention the most was a seemingly sneaky way of talking about world order. Or maybe not so sneaky, this is the first part that really opened up that topic with Obama stating:

“In an era when our destiny is shared, power is no longer a zero-sum game. No one nation can or should try to dominate another nation. No world order that elevates one nation or group of people over another will succeed. No balance of power among nations will hold.”

President Obama then continues to tell the General Assembly that they don’t want to be the generation that dragged the arguments of the 20th century into the 21st, but rather they should be the generation “that comes together to serve the common interests of human beings, and finally gives meaning to the promise embedded in the name given to this institution: the United Nations.” So, the ground work for a “new world order” is being placed. It seems that Obama feels more at home being the “President” of the world, than he does the President of the United States.

As far as I know, no sitting President in the United States has ever made so many apologies or bashed America so much as Obama has in his thus far short term. He has insulted our past presidents  and the American people as a whole in the way that he bows down (literally and figuratively) before foreign leaders with no regard for the dignity and exceptionalism of the United States of America. No country has ever so deeply sacrificed or given so much blood for the cause of freedom and happiness around the world. Yet, Obama seems only to be concerned in selling him self to the rest of the nations on earth. God help us all.

This article is 100% opinion based solely on the script of the actual UN speech by President Obama as seen here:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/09/24/us/politics/24prexy.text.html?pagewanted=6&_r=1&adxnnlx=1253736390-RRO6z4qbCdTuKihgSWTVhg

Other useful links:

http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_092309/content/01125106.guest.html

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=110759

http://live.radioamerica.org/loudwater/player.pl?name=wnd&url=http://feeds.radioamerica.org/podcast/DWP/audio/000007_012952.mp3

Posts By Category

Search Posts By Month