You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘economic crisis’ tag.

If you were not aware of what our country is doing to our economy this should give you a pretty good idea. We have in the past months been told by several nations to slow our spending, stop the stimulus money, stop the unnecessary programs, and other advice since the stimulus packages by President Bush and President Obama have been passed. The Obama administration is not taking heed to any advice though and just keeps on spending, keeps suggesting more government controlled programs that we don’t want and they can’t afford.

So, what do we get in return? The United Nations wanting to replace the US dollar (which is the current world’s reserve currency) and replace it with a new global currency. Is this good for the US, no, of course not. This could ultimately send us into an economic collapse in which we may never recover. But can you really blame them? Look at how carelessly Obama and the two Houses have been just freely spending money like it will never run out in order to fund the socialistic agenda. I saw a quote by Margaret Thatcher that reminds me of this, it said “The problem with socialism is that eventually you run out of other people’s money.” Obviously, from this article in the Telegraph, we can see that our global financiers are not going to be doing so much longer.

Read the article here:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/currency/6152204/UN-wants-new-global-currency-to-replace-dollar.html

UPDATE 09/14/09:

Report from the International Monetary Fund stated, “…the international supply of two key reserve assets—gold and the U.S. dollar—proved inadequate for supporting the expansion of world trade and financial development that was taking place.”

World Net Daily’s Jerome Corsi comments, “If the plan succeeds, the United Nations would effectively end up replacing the United States as the issuer of the one-world international currency used as the standard of foreign exchange to settle international trade transactions,” Corsi wrote. “The move would obviate the need for any nation state in the future to be the arbiter of world trade, marking yet another blow to national sovereignty on the path to one-world government.”

You may think that the story of President Obama electing to have John Holdren as the head of his Science and Technology Policy department as old news, but with the recent fear mongering of the swine flu, global warming, and other such events, I believe it is very much still a live story in need of more research. At first glance in researching John Holdren you will find that in the 1970’s he was a major adjocate for compulsory abortions in the U.S. and a “Planetary Regime”.

Having co-authored Ecoscience, it was well known John Holdren’s stance on population control and the repercussions thought at the time of letting people breed freely. The methods to unknowingly sterilize a population included methods tried by the Nazi’s, Soviet’s, and communists such as adding infertility drugs to a national food or water supply, and forced abortion to name a few. It also goes into a radical and unrealistic stance on what could happen if population were to get out of control in reference to resources and environmental impact. Like I said before, this is all very easy to find.

Now, the not so easy to find was the recent opinions of Mr. Holdren. In 1995 he also co-authored an essay called, The Meaning of Sustainability: Biogeophysical Aspects, published by the World Bank on the need to eventually have “world of zero net physical growth” and “population limitation” to sustain economic activity (ummm…very interesting considering the current economic events). Now suddenly, upon being appointed to a position in the White House his opinions change? In his White House interview he explained as stated by www.wnd.com, “when asked if he still felt population control was appropriate, health care and opportunities for women, as well as education, naturally create families more likely to have fewer children, thus solving the potential problems of population growth.” I don’t think so. Someone holding so tightly to a belief for so many years would not let it go so easily. Not to mention, Obama knows Holdren’s past, works, and beliefs having both gone to Harvard. Obama is no dummy, he would not have manged to get elected as President of the United States of America had that been the case.

In conclusion, the question in many minds at this time is if there is a connection between John Holdren’s past and the current events with the economic instability (made worse by the stimulus and will be more so by a passing of health care reform), myths of global warming, and the fear mongering of the H1N1 virus. One would have to wonder, with his new found powers as Science Czar and only having to answer to the President of the United States, not obligated to answer to Congress, John Holdren definitely warrants more scrutiny and a watchful eye on his handling of his office. Our founders would be rolling in their graves if they knew that the President gave such unlimited powers to an unelected official.

Resources:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=103707

http://www.cnsnews.com/public/content/article.aspx?RsrcID=52080

Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment by Paul R. Ehrlich co-authored by John Holdren

The Meaning of Sustainability: Biogeophysical Aspects published by World Bank 1995 (full text available at http://www-wds.worldbank.org/servlet/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1995/01/01/0000092
65_3961219103404/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf

Posts By Category

Search Posts By Month