You are currently browsing the tag archive for the ‘van jones’ tag.

I have been wanting to do a post on Cass Sunstein for a while now, but I kept hoping that he would not be approved. Sadly, he was approved by the Senate as President Obama’s newly confirmed administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. Technically he is not what the White House would refer to as a czar because he actually had to be approved unlike the others such as Mark Lloyd, John Holdren, and Van Jones (now resigned). But he holds by far the most outlandish, unbelievably ridiculous ideas I have ever seen come across our government. This guy may need real professional help, or he just might be the biggest tree hugging animal rights kook ever!

Cass Sunstein believes that animals think, feel, and deserve equal rights and treatment as human beings. He has many times quoted authors who compare animals to slaves and say that a dog is more rational than a human baby. One of these quotes that Sunstein quoted was directly from a late 18th century social reformer by the name of Jeremy Bentham having said, “The day may come, when the rest of the animal creation may acquire those rights which never could have been withholden from them but by the hand of tyranny.” And then he goes on to quote more. Can’t believe it? See it for your self here http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OoiHIbwRhSo.

Cass Sunstein also believes that animals should be able to have an attorney and bring lawsuits against humans. He wants to ban hunting all together, which of course you can see how this would in a very huge way affect the 2nd amendment. Cass is a major supporter of gun control. Sunstein thinks we should not be allowed to eat meat, we should not be allowed to remove rodents from our home if it causes them pain, AND restrictions on FARMING to prevent unnecessary animal suffering. This man also believes that ALL human beings should be organ donors, in other words, we should not have a choice. And the list goes on. His opinions really are far from that of any democrat, republican, or independent that I know. He does not reflect the will of the people, maybe the animals, but certainly not the people.

Now, here we are one day after Cass Sunstein’s approval by the Senate and he is already trying to push a new interpretation to The Bill of Rights. And although this is a surprise to most of us just learning of Cass Sunstein, it is no surprise to those who nominated and approved him into office. He has written a book in 2004 called “The Second Bill of Rights: FDR’S Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need It More than Ever” which comes from President Roosevelt’s proposal for a completely new set of bill of rights in 1944. And as published on http://www.wnd.com, in 2005 at Yale Law School, Sunstein opened a conference titled “The Constitution in 2020,” which spoke about changing the nature of the Constitution by 2020. We have to let Washington know that we do not approve of this right away! This is not acceptable and we will not stand for them changing our Bill of Rights or our Constitution. They knew who they were approving into office with the partisan vote of 57-40, and with it they gave this man way too much power. Read more about him and his proposed mandates here: Obama’s Regulatory Chief Pushes New ‘Bill of Rights’.

Resources:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=109529

http://gunowners.org/a090809.htm

Why all these “czars”? What does the President hope to accomplish? Who are they? These are some of the questions people started to ask about when reporters first exposed Van Jones, now former Green Czar, as not only making raciest statements against white Americans, but also admitted to be a self proclaimed Marxist. Yet even though Van Jones resigned over the weekend, not fired like he should have been, there still remains about 30 more czars in the Obama Administration.

Why does President Obama, or for that matter, any president nominate czars to their administration? Well, a White House spokeswoman for the Bush administration Dana Perino told Fox News that presidents like to appoint czars, because it is easier to do rather than putting them through  congressional oversight especially when congress is increasingly partisan. One would have to wonder why then is President Obama doing this in such high frequency? Yes, congress is more partisan than ever, but the Democrats have a huge majority both in the House and Senate. One would have to lean toward the fact that the President appears to be trying to bypass those that have the authority to make laws by putting these other people into power. This includes the recently appointed Ron Bloom to over see manufacturing policy. I certainly hope that our congress steps in to evaluate the responsibilities and powers given to these czars before our country is completely out of the peoples’ hands.

Resource sited:

http://www.newsmax.com/headlines/obama_czars_jones_beck/2009/09/07/257127.html

If hiring Van Jones, a known communist, as Green Czar wasn’t enough to make one wonder about who President Obama really is,  maybe hanging the Chinese Red Communist Flag on the south lawn of the White House on Sept. 20, 2009 might give you a better idea. For one who claims that he is not a communist or a socialist, he sure does like to surround himself with as much communism as he sure can. My dad always told me,” Be careful who you are friends with because they will rub off on you.” From taking over the banks, the auto industry, and now trying to take over the health care industry, one has to start believing that the President sounds more like a communist/socialist than a free thinking capitalist. Read this article about the administrations latest decision. You will surely be shocked.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=108907

Mark Lloyd, the newly appointed chief diversity officer at the Federal Communications Commission has an interesting stance on freedom of speech indeed. Although Mark Lloyd has stated that he finds the Fairness Doctrine unnecessary, his comments and previous speeches and writings prove that he does in fact support the overall goals of the Fairness Doctrine though be it through a back door method. Mark Lloyd does in fact support more regulation, more taxes and fines, increased government intervention into the commercial media such as public radio, and more in which he believes asserts diversity. Such as in the Center for America Progress proposal co-authored by Mark Lloyd which said:

“. . . a spectrum use fee should be levied on owners to directly support local, regional, and national public broadcasting. A fee based on a sliding scale (1 percent for small markets, 5 percent for the largest markets) would be distributed directly to the Corporation for Public Broadcasting with clear mandates to support local news and public affairs programming and to cover controversial and political issues in a fair and balanced manner. We estimate that such a fee would net between $100 million and $250 million.”

Mark Lloyd’s more popular public stance is one in which he praises Hugo Chavez. He praises the way that he took over the media and controlled what was once ran by the people of his nation. Lloyd calls Chavez “incredible” and “dramatic.” So, I guess Mark Lloyd is saying he approves of Hugo Chavez forcing private media out of business? It would appear that way. He has made his opinions very clear and even put them into writing as recently as 2006 in his book Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America. In that book Lloyd reveals his opinion of the First Amendment (our freedom of speech) by stating this:

“It should be clear by now that my focus here is not freedom of speech or the press. This freedom is all too often an exaggeration. At the very least blind references to freedom of speech or press serves as a distraction from the critical examination of other communication policies. The purpose of free speech is warped to protect global corporations and block rules [by the government], fines, and regulations, that would promote democratic governance.”

Unbelievable! You see, not only does he not hold freedom of speech in any high esteem, but he seeks to do away with it to promote democratic governance. This should alarm you no matter who you are. This isn’t a matter of bipartisanship, it is a matter of telling you what to think. It is a matter of telling you what you can and cannot know. It is EXACTLY the same thing that Hugo Chavez has done in Venezuela, the same that Mark Lloyd has praised.

Now, I hate to be the barer of bad news, but this is yet another communist “czar” being put in the White House. Is there anyone else who thinks this is just a little suspicious that all these people being put in are fans of socialism or communism? There are more; John Holdren, Van Jones, and Mark Lloyd are just a couple that I have touched on. I have a great deal of concern for the future of our ability to voice our opinions. I have a great deal of concern for the future of our freedom as a whole. Media has such a big way of reaching out and forming community with others, no matter what your political opinion is, it should never be silenced.

Resources:

Prologue to a Farce: Communication and Democracy in America by Mark Lloyd

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ysqsa_TeLys

http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/53195

http://www.newsmax.com/ernest_istook/obama_pelosi_/2009/08/17/248656.html

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106808

Not only are Barack Obama’s friends and mentors known communists, marxists, and other known extremists, but so are the people that he is giving power to in the White House. My previous post was on the Science and Technology “czar” John Holdren. If you haven’t read it already, you should, it has a lot of information you don’t want to miss. Now on to the man that President Obama has appointed his Environmental Adviser, Van Jones.

One would think that in order to hold a position in the White House you would need to have a great deal of qualifications. In an environmental position that would likely call for a PHD or some equivalent in environmental science or something along those lines. Not an open communist, black nationalist, attorney, and founder of STORM. ( You can only find out about STORM in the links provided below because after a report ran by www.wnd.com it was scrubbed from the internet and is only available in these archive links now.) Jones actually was arrested during the 1992 Rodney King riots and was in jail for not just one day, but four months. So it was not as reported by some as an illegal arrest, it had to be more serious than that. Not to mention upon leaving Van Jones had said “I was a rowdy nationalist on April 28th, and then the verdicts came down on April 29th,” he said. “By August, I was a communist.” And this is the man that was appointed by Obama to be the Environmental Adviser? What connection would he possibly have to the environment?

Well, after being released from jail, Van Jones then turned his focus on as he said, “trying to be a revolutionary.” He attended workshops on Challenging White Supremacy, started up the group STORM, and did a lot of speeches to recruit others of similar opinions. It was during this time that he learned he could prosper from getting involved with the “green” movement. Mr. Jones said the eco movement would be the best way to carry out his agenda. His speeches would include telling supporters off the street that someone would make millions off of these “green” project and that it should be you (him and his supporters). Getting them really fired up about pushing for the “green” movement. One reporter from the New Yorker, as said by Glenn Beck, had Jones say after one of these speeches, “That was my street rap. You get to hear my elite rap later on.” So, you see, he was and is “working”, as Beck said, the whole “green” movement.

This is not all, I could go on for several more pages on this guy. He also is has strong ties to known terrorists, communists, marxists, you name it. Some of those being Jeff Jones, Bill Ayers (also linked to Obama), Mark Rudd, and more. Don’t believe it? Van Jones not only founded STORM, he was also on the board of an environmental activist group at which the founder (Jeff Jones & Bill Ayers) of the Weather Underground terrorist organization is a top director. There is so much more, but I will leave some for you to research. But like I said in the beginning, I find it strange that our President is surrounded by these people in the White House and as long time friends. I am not a conspiracy theorist, I just can’t help seeing the puzzle pieces and hope they don’t fit together the way it looks.

Resources Sited:

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=106653

http://www.glennbeck.com/content/articles/article/198/28315/

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2009/01/12/090112fa_fact_kolbert

STORM Information:

http://web.archive.org/web/20070719020533/http://leftspot.com/blog/files/docs/STORMSummation.pdf

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=108445

Posts By Category

Search Posts By Month